Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), specifically skin abscesses, are an increasingly common cause for emergency department (ED) visits. Many of these are uncomplicated and are treated in the ED with incision and drainage (I&D) and then discharged. In an era of increasing rates of methicillin-resistant staph aureus (MRSA), there may be a role for adjunct therapy with oral antibiotics to improve cure rates. Previous studies addressing this question have only included small study group sizes and did not demonstrate a benefit of antibiotic treatment. Because of this, practice guidelines for abscess treatment currently recommend that drainage alone is sufficient for treatment and that adjunctive therapy with antibiotics is only necessary in patients who are immunocompromised, diameter >5cm, have surrounding cellulitis, and signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).
However, one recent large randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that healthy outpatients >12 years of age with uncomplicated skin abscesses treated with I&D and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) had a higher cure rate than those treated with I&D and placebo, which supports a role for antibiotic therapy (Talan 2016). This study did not evaluate treatment in children less than 12 years of age, compared only placebo to TMP-SMX and did not evaluate other antibiotics that treat MRSA.
Is the clinical cure of small cutaneous abscesses that are I&D’d in the ED improved with a 10 day course of TMP-SMX or clindamycin versus placebo?
Adults and children with uncomplicated skin abscesses <5cm (≤3 cm for participants 6 to 11 months of age and ≤4 cm for participants 1 to 8 years of age)
Clindamycin 300mg TID or TMP-SMX 800-160mg BID (participants randomized to the TMP-SMX group were given a placebo pill for the midday dose)
Primary: Clinical cure by the time of the test-of-cure (TOC) visit, which occurred 7-10 days after the prescribed 10-day course of therapy
Secondary: Clinical cure at the end-of-treatment visit (day 12) and 1-month follow-up visit; cure rates in adults vs. children; the cure rates for patients infected with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus MSSA), MRSA, or other strains; and adverse-event rate.
Multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial
Superficial skin infections (e.g impetigo)
Infection at a body site requiring specialized management (e.g. perirectal, genital or hand)
Human or animal bite
Oral temperature greater than 38.5 C (38C for children 6-11 months of age)
Presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria
immunosuppressive therapy or an immunocompromising condition (e.g. Diabetes, chronic renal failure)
body-mass index greater than 40
Surgical site or prosthetic device infection
Systemic anti-staphylococcal antibacterial therapy in the past 14 days
Any patient requiring hospitalization
Living in a long-term care facility
Cancer or inflammatory disorder treated in the previous 12 months
Major surgery in the past 12 months
- 786 participants (505 adults, 281 children, mean age 25.5 years)
- 67% of patients had S. aureus, 49% had MRSA
Clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit in the intention-to-treat population (Primary Outcome)
|All Participants Cure Rate||83.1% (78.3 – 87.9)||81.7% (76.8-86.7)||68.9% (62.9-74.9)|
|Children Cure Rate||89.1% (82.5-95.7)||82.4% (74.0-90.8)||68.5% (58.3-78.7)|
|Adult Cure Rate||79.4% (72.9-85.9)||81.4% (75.3—87.5)||69.0% (61.8-76.3)|
|MRSA isolated||81.7 (75.0-88.4)||84.6 (78.0-91.2)||62.9 (53.7- 72.2)|
|MSSA isolated||89.1 (79.0-99.2)||79.6 (67.3- 91.9)||65.9 (50.8-81.1)|
|1 Month follow-up||78.6||73.0||62.6|
|Treatment Related Adverse Events||21.9%||11.1%||12.5%|
|Area of Surrounding Erythema (cm2)||26.85 +/- 104.34||29.68 +/- 93.76||25.76 +/- 53.11|
- The cure rate in the placebo group was significantly lower than that in the clindamycin group (P<0.001) and that in the TMP-SMX group (P<0.001)
- The difference between the cure rate in the TMP-SMX group and that in the clindamycin group was not significant (−P=0.37)
- The results were similar for the population that could be evaluated analysis with significantly different cure rates for placebo versus either antibiotic but no significant difference between clindamycin and TMP-SMX
- Children had a significantly higher cure rate with clindamycin than with placebo or with TMP-SMX, while this difference was not significant in the adult population
- No significant difference in surrounding erythema between treatment arms
- Most adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved without intervention or sequela
- No c. diff infections reported
- Addressed a simple, clinically relevant question with a patient centered outcome
- Randomization and blinding were appropriately performed
- Large, multicenter study throughout different geographical regions of the United States
- Appropriately powered for the primary outcome
- Only evaluated two antibiotics that treat MRSA (for example, did not include doxycycline)
- Follow-up was short-term and ended at 1 month
- Variability in I&D skills among ED providers in the study leading to possibility of incomplete drainage and treatment failure
- Patients had moderately sized overlying erythema raising the question of whether clinicians were treating cellulitis (which is widely accepted as requiring antibiotics)
“As compared with incision and drainage alone, clindamycin or TMP-SMX in conjunction with incision and drainage improves short-term outcomes in patients who have a simple abscess. This benefit must be weighed against the known side-effect profile of these antimicrobials.”
After I&D of small uncomplicated abscesses in healthy patients with overlying cellulitis, an adjunct course of oral antibiotics with activity against MRSA (clindamycin or TMP-SMX) appears to increase short-term cure rates. In particular, when treating children, clindamycin has a higher cure rate than TMP-SMX or placebo. Clindamycin had lower rates of recurrence of infection at one month when compared to TMP-SMX.
Potential Impact To Current Practice
The findings of this study show strong evidence that antibiotic therapy, in addition to I&D, leads to higher cure rates for small abscesses with overlying cellulitis. These findings should not be taken to mean that all patients with abscesses who are I&D’d in the ED will need antibiotics as the majority of abscesses will resolve with I&D alone. The increased clinical cure rate must be weighed against the potential risks associated with increase antibiotic use such as adverse medication-related events and increasing antibiotic resistance.
ED providers should consider adjunctive therapy with oral antibiotics with MRSA coverage after I&D of simple, small (<5cm) abscesses with overlying cellulitis in healthy individuals to increase short-term cure rates. There may be an additional benefit of clindamycin over TMP-SMX when treating children. Providers should refer to their local antibiograms for more specific antibiotic recommendations against MRSA. The presence of significant overlying cellulitis continues to warrant adjunctive therapy with antibiotics.
EM Nerd: The Case of the Pragmatic Wound
Talan D et al. Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Placebo for Uncomplicated Skin Abscess. NEJM 2016; 374:823-32. PMID: 26962903