Sophie Karwoska Kligler, MD
Why It Matters
Timely, high-quality CPR remains the cornerstone of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation, with strong evidence demonstrating significant improvements in rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, and neurologically intact survival. Mechanical CPR devices such as the LUCAS (Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System) promise consistent, guideline-compliant compressions while reducing rescuer fatigue and improving provider safety — especially in pre-hospital settings where provider numbers are limited and circumstances often require complex extrication and prolonged transportation. The theoretical physiologic benefits of this intervention are clear — but translation to improved patient-centered outcomes has been less convincing. Despite increasing adoption by EMS systems both within the US and abroad, clinical outcome data remain mixed, raising important questions about when and how mechanical CPR devices should be used.
Prevalence of mechanical CPR use
U.S. registry data show that mechanical CPR use overall has steadily increased over the past 2 decades,
Read More


